INTERNET-DRAFT Editor: Kurt D. Zeilenga
Intended Category: Standard Track OpenLDAP Foundation
Expires in six months 23 October 2005
Obsoletes: RFC 1274, RFC 2247
Updates: RFC 2798
COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema
<draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01.txt>
Status of this Memo
This document is intended to be, after appropriate review and
revision, submitted to the RFC Editor as a Standard Track document.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Technical discussion of this
document will take place on the IETF LDAPEXT mailing list
<ldapext@ietf.org>. Please send editorial comments directly to the
author <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>.
By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any
applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have
been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware
will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task
Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other
groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material
or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html
The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). All Rights Reserved.
Please see the Full Copyright section near the end of this document
for more information.
Abstract
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 1]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
This document provides a collection of schema elements for use with
the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) from the COSINE and
Internet X.500 pilot projects.
This document obsoletes RFC 1274 and RFC 2247.
Table of Contents
Status of this Memo 1
Abstract 2
Table of Contents
1. Background and Intended Use 3
1.1. Relationship with Other Documents
1.2. Terminology and Conventions
2. COSINE Attribute Types 4
2.1. associatedDomain
2.2. associatedName
2.3. buildingName
2.3. co
2.5. documentAuthor
2.6. documentIdentifier
2.7. documentLocation
2.8. documentPublisher
2.9. documentTitle
2.10. documentVersion
2.11. drink
2.12. homePhone
2.13. homePostalAddress
2.14. host
2.16. info
2.17. mail
2.18. manager
2.19. mobile
2.20. organizationalStatus
2.21. pager
2.22. personalTitle
2.23. roomNumber
2.24. secretary
2.26. uniqueIdentifier
2.27. userClass
3. COSINE Object Classes 14
3.1. account
3.2. document
3.3. documentSeries
3.4. domain
3.5. domainRelatedObject
3.6. friendlyCountry
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 2]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
3.7. rFC822LocalPart
3.8. room
3.9. simpleSecurityObject
4. Security Considerations 19
5. IANA Considerations 20
6. Acknowledgments 21
7. Editor's Address
8. References
A. Changes Since RFC 1274 23
Intellectual Property Rights 24
Full Copyright
1. Background and Intended Use
In the late 1980s, X.500 Directory Services were standardised by the
CCITT (Commite' Consultatif International de Telegraphique et
Telephonique), now a part of the ITU (International Telephone Union).
This lead to Directory Service piloting activities in the early 1990s,
including the COSINE (Co-operation and Open Systems Interconnection in
Europe) PARADISE Project pilot [COSINEpilot] in Europe. Motivated by
needs large scale directory pilots, RFC 1274 was published to
standardize directory schema and naming architecture for use in the
COSINE and other Internet X.500 pilots [RFC1274].
In the years that followed, X.500 Directory Services have evolved to
incorporate new capabilities and even new protocols. In particular,
the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) [Roadmap] was
introduced in the early 1990s [RFC1487], with Version 3 of LDAP
introduced in the late 1990s [RFC2251] and subsequently revised in the
2005 [Roadmap].
While much of the material in RFC 1274 has been superceed by
subsequently published ITU-T Recommendations and IETF RFCs, many of
the schema elements lack standardized schema descriptions for use in
modern X.500 and LDAP directory services despite the fact that these
schema elements are in wide use today. As the old schema descriptions
cannot be used without adaptation, interoperabilty issues may arise
due to lack of standardized modern schema descriptions.
This document addresses these issues by offering standardized schema
descriptions, where needed, for widely-used COSINE schema elements.
1.1. Relationship to Other Documents
This document, together with [Schema] and [Syntaxes], obsoletes RFC
1274 in its entirety. [Schema] replaces Sections 9.3.1 (Userid) and
Section 9.3.21 (Domain Component) of RFC 1274. [Syntaxes] replaces
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 3]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
section 9.4 (Generally useful syntaxes) of RFC 1274.
This document replaces the remainder of RFC 1274. Appendix A.
discusses changes since RFC 1274, as well as why certain schema
elements were not brought forward in this revision of the COSINE
schema. All elements not brought are to be regarded as Historic.
This document, together with [NamingPlan] and [Schema], obsoletes RFC
2247 in its entirety. [Schema] replaces Section 4 (Attribute Type
Definition) and Section 5.1 (The dcObject object class) of RFC 2247.
This document replaces Section 5.2 (The domain object class) of RFC
2247. The remainder of RFC 2247 is replaced by [NamingPlan].
Some of these items were described in RFC 2798 (inetOrgPerson schema).
This document supersedes these descriptions. This document, together
with [Schema], replaces section 9.1.3 of RFC 2798.
1.2. Terminology and Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119].
DIT stands for Directory Information Tree.
DN stands for Distinguished Name.
DSA stands for Directory System Agent, a server.
DSE stands for DSA-Specific Entry.
DUA stands for Directory User Agent, a client.
These terms are discussed in [Models].
Schema definitions are provided using LDAP description formats
[Models]. Definitions provided here are formatted (line wrapped) for
readability.
2. COSINE Attribute Types
This section details COSINE attribute types for use in LDAP.
2.1. associatedDomain
The 'associatedDomain' attribute specifies DNS domains [RFC1034] which
are associated with an object. For example, the entry in the DIT with
a DN <DC=example,DC=com> might have an associated domain of
"example.com".
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 4]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.37 NAME 'associatedDomain'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match
SUBSTR caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26 )
The IA5String (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreIA5Match' and 'caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch' rules are
described in [Syntaxes].
It is noted that the directory will not ensure that values of this
attribute conform to the <domain> production [RFC1034]. It is the
application responsibility to ensure domains it stores in this
attribute are appropriately represented.
It is also noted that applications supporting Internationalized Domain
Names SHALL use the ToASCII method [RFC3490] to produce <label>
components of the <domain> production.
2.2. associatedName
The 'associatedName' attribute specifies names of entries in the
organizational DIT associated with a DNS domain [RFC1034].
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.38 NAME 'associatedName'
EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 )
The DistinguishedName (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12) syntax and the
'distinguishedNameMatch' rule are described in [Syntaxes].
2.3. buildingName
The 'buildingName' attribute specifies names of the buildings where an
organization or organizational unit is based. For example, "The White
House".
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.48 NAME 'buildingName'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 5]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
2.3. co
The 'co' (Friendly Country Name) attribute specifies names of
countries in human-readable format. For example, "Germany" and
"Federal Republic of Germany". It is commonly used in conjunction
with the 'c' (Country Name) [Schema] attribute (whose values are
restricted to the two-letter codes defined in [ISO3166]).
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.43 NAME 'co'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.5. documentAuthor
The 'documentAuthor' attribute specifies the distinguished name of
authors (or editors) of a document. For example,
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.14 NAME 'documentAuthor'
EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 )
The DistinguishedName (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12) syntax and the
'distinguishedNameMatch' rule are described in [Syntaxes].
2.6. documentIdentifier
The 'documentIdentifier' attribute specifies unique identifiers for a
document. A document may be identified by more than one unique
identifier. For example, RFC 3383 and BCP 64 are unique identifers
which (presently) refer to the same document.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.11 NAME 'documentIdentifier'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 6]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
2.7. documentLocation
The 'documentLocation' attribute specifies locations of the document
original.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.15 NAME 'documentLocation'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.8. documentPublisher
The 'documentPublisher' attribute is the persons and/or organizations
that published the document. Documents which are jointly published
have one value for each publisher.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.56 NAME 'documentPublisher'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.9. documentTitle
The 'documentTitle' attribute specifies the titles of a document.
Multiple values are allowed to accomadate both long and short titles,
or other situations where a document has multiple titles. For
example, "The Lightweight Directory Access Protocol Technical
Specification" and "The LDAP Technical Specification".
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.12 NAME 'documentTitle'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 7]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
2.10. documentVersion
The 'documentVersion' attribute specifies the version information of a
document.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.13 NAME 'documentVersion'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.11. drink
The 'drink' (favoriteDrink) attribute specifies favorite drinks of an
object (or person). For instance, "cola" and "beer".
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.5 NAME 'drink'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.12. homePhone
The 'homePhone' (Home Telephone Number) attribute specifies home
telephone numbers (e.g., "+1 775 555 1234") associated with a person.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.20 NAME 'homePhone'
EQUALITY telephoneNumberMatch
SUBSTR telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 )
The telephoneNumber (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50) syntax and the
'telephoneNumberMatch' and 'telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch' rules are
described in [Syntaxes].
2.13. homePostalAddress
The 'homePostalAddress' attribute specifies home postal addresses for
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 8]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
an object. Each value should be limited to up to 6 directory strings
of 30 characters each. (Note: it is not intended that the directory
service enforce these limits.)
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.39 NAME 'homePostalAddress'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreListMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41 )
The PostalAddress (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.41) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreListMatch' and 'caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch' rules are
described in [Syntaxes].
2.14. host
The 'host' attribute specifies host computers, generally by their
primary fully-qualified domain name (e.g., my-host.example.com).
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.9 NAME 'host'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.16. info
The 'info' attribute specifies any general information pertinent to an
object. This information is not necessarily descriptive of the
object.
Applications should not attach specific semantics to values of this
attribute. The 'description' attribute [Schema] is available for
specifying descriptive information pertinent to an object.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.4 NAME 'info'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{2048} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 9]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
2.17. mail
The 'mail' (rfc822mailbox) attribute type holds Internet mail
addresses in Mailbox [RFC2821] form (e.g.: user@example.com).
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3 NAME 'mail'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match
SUBSTR caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26{256} )
The IA5String (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreIA5Match' and 'caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch' rules are
described in [Syntaxes].
It is noted that the directory will not ensure that values of this
attribute conform to the <Mailbox> production [RFC2821]. It is the
application responsibility to ensure domains it stores in this
attribute are appropriately represented.
Additionally, the directory will compare values per the matching rules
named in the above attribute type description. As these rules differ
from rules which normally apply to <Mailbox> comparisons, operational
issues may arise. For example, the assertion (mail=joe@example.com)
will match "JOE@example.com" even though the <local-parts> differ.
Also, where a user has two <Mailbox>es which whose addresses differ
only by case of the <local-part>, both cannot be listed as values of
the user's mail attribute (as they are considered by the
'caseIgnoreIA5Match' rule to be equal).
It is also noted that applications supporting internationalized domain
names SHALL use the ToASCII method [RFC3490] to produce <sub-domain>
components of the <Mailbox> production.
2.18. manager
The 'manager' attribute specifies managers, by distinguished name, of
the person (or entity).
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.10 NAME 'manager'
EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 )
The DistinguishedName (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12) syntax and the
'distinguishedNameMatch' rule are described in [Syntaxes].
2.19. mobile
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 10]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
The 'mobile' (mobileTelephoneNumber) attribute specifies mobile
telephone numbers (e.g., "+1 775 555 6789") associated with a person
(or entity).
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.41 NAME 'mobile'
EQUALITY telephoneNumberMatch
SUBSTR telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 )
The telephoneNumber (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50) syntax and the
'telephoneNumberMatch' and 'telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch' rules are
described in [Syntaxes].
2.20. organizationalStatus
The 'organizationalStatus' attribute specifies categories by which a
person is often referred to in an organization. Examples of usage in
academia might include "undergraduate student", "researcher",
"professor", "staff", etc.. Multiple values are allowed were the
person is in multiple categories.
Directory administrators and application designers SHOULD consider
carefully the distinctions between this and the 'title' and
'userClass' attributes.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.45 NAME 'organizationalStatus'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.21. pager
The 'pager' (pagerTelephoneNumber) attribute specifies pager telephone
numbers (e.g., "+1 775 555 5555") for an object.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.42 NAME 'pager'
EQUALITY telephoneNumberMatch
SUBSTR telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50 )
The telephoneNumber (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.50) syntax and the
'telephoneNumberMatch' and 'telephoneNumberSubstringsMatch' rules are
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 11]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
described in [Syntaxes].
2.22. personalTitle
The 'personalTitle' attribute specifies personal titles for a person.
Examples of personal titles are "Frau", "Dr.", "Herr", and
"Professor".
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.40 NAME 'personalTitle'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.23. roomNumber
The 'roomNumber' attribute specifies the room number of an object.
During periods of renumbering or in other circumstances where a room
has multiple valid room numbers associated with it, multiple values
may be provided. Note that the 'cn' (commonName) attribute type
SHOULD be used for naming room objects.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.6 NAME 'roomNumber'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
2.24. secretary
The 'secretary' attribute specifies secretaries and/or administrative
assistants, by distinguish name, of a person.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.21 NAME 'secretary'
EQUALITY distinguishedNameMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12 )
The DistinguishedName (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.12) syntax and the
'distinguishedNameMatch' rule are described in [Syntaxes].
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 12]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
2.26. uniqueIdentifier
The 'uniqueIdentifier' attribute specifies a unique identifier for an
object represented in the Directory. The domain within which the
identifier is unique, and the exact semantics of the identifier, are
for local definition. For a person, this might be an institution-wide
payroll number. For an organizational unit, it might be a department
code.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.44 NAME 'uniqueIdentifier'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
Note: X.520 also describes an attribute called 'uniqueIdentifier'
(2.5.4.45) which is called 'x500UniqueIdentifier' in LDAP
[Schema]. The attribute detailed here ought not be confused
with 'x500UniqueIdentifier'.
2.27. userClass
The 'userClass' attribute specifies categories of computer or
application user. The semantics placed on this attribute are for
local interpretation. Examples of current usage of this attribute in
academia are "student", "staff", "faculty", etc.. Note that the
'organizationalStatus' attribute type is now often be preferred as it
makes no distinction between persons as opposed to users.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.8 NAME 'userClass'
EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{256} )
The DirectoryString (1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) syntax and the
'caseIgnoreMatch' and 'caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch' rules are described
in [Syntaxes].
3. COSINE Object Classes
This section details COSINE object classes for use in LDAP.
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 13]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
3.1. account
The 'account' object class is used to define entries representing
computer accounts. The 'uid' attribute SHOULD be used for naming
entries of this object class.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.5 NAME 'account'
SUP top STRUCTURAL
MUST uid
MAY ( description $ seeAlso $ l $ o $ ou $ host ) )
The 'top' object class is described in [Models]. The 'description',
'seeAlso', 'l', 'o', 'ou', and 'uid' attribute types are described in
[Schema]. The 'host' attribute type is described in Section 2 of this
document.
Example:
dn: uid=kdz,cn=Accounts,dc=Example,dc=COM
objectClass: account
uid: kdz
seeAlso: cn=Kurt D. Zeilenga,cn=Persons,dc=Example,dc=COM
3.2. document
The 'document' object class is used to define entries which represent
documents.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.6 NAME 'document'
SUP top STRUCTURAL
MUST documentIdentifier
MAY ( cn $ description $ seeAlso $ l $ o $ ou $
documentTitle $ documentVersion $ documentAuthor $
documentLocation $ documentPublisher ) )
The 'top' object class is described in [Models]. The 'cn',
'description', 'seeAlso', 'l', 'o', and 'ou' attribute types are
described in [Schema]. The 'documentIdentifier', 'documentTitle',
'documentVersion', 'documentAuthor', 'documentLocation', and
'documentPublisher' attribute types are described in Section 2 of this
document.
Example:
dn: documentIdentifier=RFCXXXX,cn=RFC,dc=Example,dc=COM
objectClass: document
documentIdentifier: RFC XXXXX
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 14]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
documentTitle: COSINE LDAP/X.500 Schema
documentAuthor: cn=Kurt D. Zeilenga,cn=Persons,dc=Example,dc=COM
documentLocation: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.txt
documentPublisher: Internet Engineering Task Force
description: A collection of schema elements for use in LDAP
description: Obsoletes RFC 1274
seeAlso: documentIdentifier=[Roadmap],cn=RFC,dc=Example,dc=COM
seeAlso: documentIdentifier=RFC 1274,cn=RFC,dc=Example,dc=COM
3.3. documentSeries
The documentSeries object class is used to define an entry which
represents a series of documents (e.g., The Request For Comments
memos).
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.9 NAME 'documentSeries'
SUP top STRUCTURAL
MUST cn
MAY ( description $ l $ o $ ou $ seeAlso $
telephonenumber ) )
The 'top' object class is described in [Models]. The 'description',
'l', 'o', 'ou', 'seeAlso', and 'telephoneNumber' attribute types are
described in [Schema].
Example:
dn: cn=RFC,dc=Example,dc=COM
objectClass: documentSeries
cn: Request for Comments
cn: RFC
description: a series of memos about the Internet
3.4. domain
The 'domain' object class is used to define entries which represent
DNS domains for objects which are not organizations, organizational
units, or other kinds of objects more approproiately defined using an
object class specific to the kind of object being defined (e.g.,
'organization', 'organizationUnit', etc.).
The 'dc' attribute should be used for naming entries of 'domain'
object class.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.13 NAME 'domain'
SUP top STRUCTURAL
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 15]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
MUST dc
MAY ( userPassword $ searchGuide $ seeAlso $ businessCategory $
x121Address $ registeredAddress $ destinationIndicator $
preferredDeliveryMethod $ telexNumber $
teletexTerminalIdentifier $ telephoneNumber $
internationaliSDNNumber $ facsimileTelephoneNumber $ street $
postOfficeBox $ postalCode $ postalAddress $
physicalDeliveryOfficeName $ st $ l $ description $ o $
associatedName ) )
The 'top' object class and the 'dc', 'userPassword', 'searchGuide
'seeAlso', 'businessCategory', 'x121Address', 'registeredAddress
'destinationIndicator', 'preferredDeliveryMethod', 'telexNumber',
'teletexTerminalIdentifier', 'telephoneNumber',
'internationaliSDNNumber', 'facsimileTelephoneNumber', 'street',
'postOfficeBox', 'postalCode', 'postalAddress',
'physicalDeliveryOfficeName', 'st', 'l', 'description', 'o', types are
described in [Schema]. The 'associatedName' attribute type is
described in Section 2 of this document.
Example:
dn: dc=com
objectClass: domain
dc: com
description: the .COM TLD
3.5. domainRelatedObject
The 'domainRelatedObject' object class is used to define entries which
represent DNS domains which are "equivalent" to an X.500 domain: e.g.,
an organization or organizational unit.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.17 NAME 'domainRelatedObject'
SUP top AUXILIARY
MUST associatedDomain )
The 'top' object class is described in [Models]. The
'associatedDomain' attribute type is described in Section 2 of this
document.
Example:
dn: dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: organization
objectClass: dcObject
objectClass: domainRelatedObject
dc: example
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 16]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
associatedDomain: example.com
o: Example Organization
The 'organization' and 'dcObject' object classes and the 'dc' and 'o'
attribute types are described in [Schema].
3.5. friendlyCountry
The 'friendlyCountry' object class is used to define entries
representing countries in the DIT. The object class is used to allow
friendlier naming of countries than that allowed by the object class
'country' [Schema].
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.18 NAME 'friendlyCountry'
SUP country STRUCTURAL
MUST co )
The 'country' object class is described in [Schema]. The 'co'
attribute type is described in Section 2 of this document.
Example:
dn: c=DE
objectClass: country
objectClass: friendlyCountry
c: DE
co: Deutschland
co: Germany
co: Federal Republic of Germany
co: FRG
The 'c' attribute type is described in [Schema].
3.6. rFC822LocalPart
The 'rFC822LocalPart' object class is used to define entries which
represent the local part of Internet mail addresses [RFC2822]. This
treats the local part of the address as a 'domain' object.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.14 NAME 'rFC822localPart'
SUP domain STRUCTURAL
MAY ( cn $ description $ destinationIndicator $
facsimileTelephoneNumber $ internationaliSDNNumber $
physicalDeliveryOfficeName $ postalAddress $ postalCode $
postOfficeBox $ preferredDeliveryMethod $ registeredAddress $
seeAlso $ sn $ street $ telephoneNumber $
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 17]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
teletexTerminalIdentifier $ telexNumber $ x121Address ) )
The 'domain' object class is described in Section 3.4 of this
document. The 'cn', 'description', 'destinationIndicator',
'facsimileTelephoneNumber', 'internationaliSDNNumber,
'physicalDeliveryOfficeName', 'postalAddress', 'postalCode',
'postOfficeBox', 'preferredDeliveryMethod', 'registeredAddress',
'seeAlso', 'sn, 'street', 'telephoneNumber',
'teletexTerminalIdentifier', 'telexNumber' and 'x121Address' attribute
types are described in [Schema].
Example:
dn: dc=kdz,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: domain
objectClass: rFC822LocalPart
dc: kdz
associatedName: cn=Kurt D. Zeilenga,cn=Persons,dc=Example,dc=COM
The 'dc' attribute type is described in [Schema].
3.7. room
The 'room' object class is used to define entries representing rooms.
The 'cn' (commonName) attribute SHOULD be used for naming entries of
this object class.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.7 NAME 'room'
SUP top STRUCTURAL
MUST cn
MAY ( roomNumber $ description $ seeAlso $ telephoneNumber ) )
The 'top' object class is described in [Models]. The 'cn',
'description', 'seeAlso' and 'telephoneNumber' attribute types are
described in [Schema]. The 'roomNumber' attribute type is described
in Section 2 of this document.
dn: cn=conference room,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: room
cn: conference room
telephoneNumber: +1 755 555 1111
3.8. simpleSecurityObject
The 'simpleSecurityObject' object class is used to require an entry to
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 18]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
have an 'userPassword' attribute when the entry's structural object
class does not require (or allow) the 'userPassword attribute'.
( 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.19 NAME 'simpleSecurityObject'
SUP top AUXILIARY
MUST userPassword )
The 'top' object class is described in [Models]. The 'userPassword'
attribute type is described in [Schema].
dn: dc=kdz,dc=Example,dc=COM
objectClass: account
objectClass: simpleSecurityObject
uid: kdz
userPassword: My Password
seeAlso: cn=Kurt D. Zeilenga,cn=Persons,dc=Example,dc=COM
4. Security Considerations
General LDAP security considerations [Roadmap] is applicable to the
use of this schema. Additional considerations are noted above where
appropriate.
Directories administrators should ensure that access to sensitive
information is restricted to authorized entities, but ensure that
appropriate data security services, including data integrity and data
confidentiality, are used to protect against eavesdropping.
Simple authentication (e.g., plain text passwords) mechanisms should
only be used when adequate data security services are in place. LDAP
offers reasonable strong authentication and data security services
[AuthMeth].
5. IANA Considerations
It is requested that the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)
update upon Standard Action the LDAP descriptors registry [BCP64bis]
as indicated the following template:
Subject: Request for LDAP Descriptor Registration Update
Descriptor (short name): see comment
Object Identifier: see comments
Person & email address to contact for further information:
Kurt Zeilenga <kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Usage: see comments
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 19]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
Specification: RFC XXXX
Author/Change Controller: IESG
Comments:
The following descriptors should be updated to refer to RFC XXXX.
NAME Type OID
------------------------ ---- --------------------------
account O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.5
associatedDomain A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.37
associatedName A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.38
buildingName A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.48
co A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.43
document O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.6
documentAuthor A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.14
documentIdentifier A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.11
documentLocation A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.15
documentPublisher A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.56
documentSeries O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.8
documentTitle A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.12
documentVersion A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.13
domain O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.13
domainRelatedObject O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.17
drink A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.5
favouriteDrink A* 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.5
friendlyCountry O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.18
friendlyCountryName A* 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.43
homePhone A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.20
homePostalAddress A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.39
homeTelephone A* 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.20
host A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.9
info A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.4
mail A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3
manager A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.10
mobile A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.41
mobileTelephoneNumber A* 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.41
organizationalStatus A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.45
pager A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.42
pagerTelephoneNumber A* 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.42
personalTitle A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.40
rFC822LocalPart O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.14
rfc822Mailbox A* 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.3
room O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.7
roomNumber A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.6
secretary A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.21
simpleSecurityObject O 0.9.2342.19200300.100.4.19
singleLevelQuality A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.50
uniqueIdentifier A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.44
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 20]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
userClass A 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.8
where Type A is Attribute and Type O is ObjectClass, and *
indicates the registration is historic in nature.
6. Acknowledgments
This document is based upon RFC 1274 by Paul Barker and Steve Kille,
as well as RFC 2247 by Steve Kill, Mark Wahl, Al Grimstad, Rick Huber,
and Sri Satulari.
7. Editor's Address
Kurt D. Zeilenga
OpenLDAP Foundation
Email: Kurt@OpenLDAP.org
8. References
[[Note to the RFC Editor: please replace the citation tags used in
referencing Internet-Drafts with tags of the form RFCnnnn where
possible.]]
8.1. Normative References
[RFC1034] Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts
and facilities", STD 13 (also RFC 1034), November 1987.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14 (also RFC 2119), March 1997.
[RFC2247] Kille, S., M. Wahl, A. Grimstad, R. Huber and S.
Sataluri, "Using Domains in LDAP/X.500 Distinguished
Names", January 1998.
[RFC2821] Klensin, J. (editor), "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol",
RFC 2822, April 2001.
[RFC3490] Faltstrom, P., P. Hoffman, and A. Costello,
"Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications
(INDA)", RFC 3490, March 2003.
[Roadmap] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Technical Specification
Road Map", draft-ietf-ldapbis-roadmap-xx.txt, a work in
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 21]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
progress.
[Models] Zeilenga, K. (editor), "LDAP: Directory Information
Models", draft-ietf-ldapbis-models-xx.txt, a work in
progress.
[Syntaxes] Legg, S. (editor), "LDAP: Syntaxes and Matching Rules",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-syntaxes-xx.txt, a work in progress.
[Schema] Dally, K. (editor), "LDAP: User Schema",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-user-schema-xx.txt, a work in
progress.
[AuthMeth] Harrison, R. (editor), "LDAP: Authentication Methods and
Connection Level Security Mechanisms",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-authmeth-xx.txt, a work in progress.
8.2. Informative References
[COSINEpilot]
[NamingPlan] Zeilenga, K., "The Internet Naming Plan for LDAP/X.500
Directories", draft-zeilenga-ldap-namingplan-xx.txt, a
work in progress.
[ISO3166] International Organization for Standardization, "Codes
for the representation of names of countries", ISO 3166.
[RFC1274] Barker, P. and S. Kille, "The COSINE and Internet X.500
Schema", November 1991.
[RFC2798] Smith, M., "The LDAP inetOrgPerson Object Class", RFC
2798, April 2000.
[BCP64bis] Zeilenga, K., "IANA Considerations for LDAP",
draft-ietf-ldapbis-bcp64-xx.txt, a work in progress.
Appendix A. Changes since RFC 1274
This document represents a substantial rewrite of RFC 1274. The
following sections summarize the substantive changes.
A.1. LDAP Short Names
A number of COSINE attribute types have short names in LDAP.
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 22]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
X.500 Name LDAP Short Name
------------- ---------------
domainComponent dc
favoriteDrink drink
friendCountryName co
homeTelephoneNumber homePhone
mobileTelephoneNumber mobile
pagerTelephoneNumber pager
rfc822Mailbox mail
userid uid
While the LDAP short names are generally used in LDAP, some
implementations may (for legacy reasons [Historic]) recognize the
attribute type by its X.500 name. Hence, the X.500 names have been
reserved solely for this purpose.
Note: 'uid' and 'dc' are described in [Schema].
A.2. pilotObject
The 'pilotObject' object class was not brought forward as its function
is largely replaced by operational attributes introduced in X.500(93)
[X.501] and version 3 of LDAP [Models]. For instance, the function
of the 'lastModifiedBy' and 'lastModifiedTime' attribute types is now
served by the 'creatorsName', 'createTimestamp', 'modifiersName', and
'modifyTimestamp' operational attributes [Models].
A.3. pilotPerson
The 'pilotPerson' object class was not brought forward as its function
is largely replaced by the 'organizationalPerson' [Models] object
class and its subclasses, such as 'inetOrgPerson' [RFC2798].
Most of the related attribute types (e.g., 'mail', 'manager', etc.)
were brought forward as they are used in other object classes.
A.4. dNSDomain
The 'dNSDomain' object class and related attribute types were not
brought forward as its use is primarily experimental [RFC1279].
A.5. pilotDSA and qualityLabelledData
The 'pilotDSA' and 'qualityLabelledData' object classes, as well as
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 23]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
related attribute types, were not brought forward as it as its use is
primarily experimental [QoS].
A.6. Attribute syntaxes
RFC 1274 defined and used caseIgnoreIA5StringSyntax attribute syntax.
This has been replaced with the IA5String syntax and approrpiate
matching rules in 'mail' and 'associatedDomain'.
RFC 1274 restricted 'mail' to have non-zero length values. This
restriction is not reflected in the IA5String syntax used in the
definitions provided in this specification. However, as values are
to conform to the <Mailbox> production, the 'mail' should not contain
zero-length values. Unfornuately, the directory service will not
enforce this restriction.
Appendix B. Changes since RFC 2247
The 'domainNameForm' name form was not brought forward as
specification of name forms used in LDAP is left to a future
specification.
Intellectual Property Rights
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found
in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification
can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 24]
INTERNET-DRAFT COSINE Schema 23 October 2005
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Full Copyright
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Zeilenga draft-zeilenga-ldap-cosine-01 [Page 25]
|
